Friday, 16th November 2018

register | forgot password?

Owner Gets to Keep Hearing Dog

Wednesday, 12th June 2013

A by-law cannot prevent an owner keeping a hearing dog on a lot or common property. But just what is a hearing dog? And when will an owner be allowed to keep one even if there is a by-law banning pets in the building?

A by-law cannot prevent an owner keeping a hearing dog on a lot or common property.  But just what is a hearing dog? And when will an owner be allowed to keep one even if there is a by-law banning pets in the building?

Introduction

Mr and Mrs Drexler live in an apartment in Pyrmont with their Jack Russell terrier named Larry.  The owners corporation of the building passed a by-law prohibiting the keeping of animals in the building.  Mr and Mrs Drexler said that the by-law did not apply to them because Larry is used as a hearing dog.  They relied on section 49(4) of the Strata Schemes Management Act 1996 which says that a by-law cannot prohibit or restrict the keeping on a lot of a dog used as a guide or hearing dog.

The Litigation

The owners corporation applied to a strata schemes adjudicator for an order that Larry be removed from the building.  The owners corporation was successful and Mr and Mrs Drexler were ordered to remove Larry from the building.  Mr and Mrs Drexler successfully appealed against the adjudicator's decision with the CTTT deciding that Larry was a hearing dog and could remain in the building.  The owners corporation appealed against the CTTT's decision to the District Court.  The owners corporation argued that Larry was not a hearing dog and therefore Mr and Mrs Drexler could not keep him in their apartment because of the by-law prohibiting pets in the building.

What is a Hearing Dog?

Section 49(4) of the Strata Schemes Management Act 1996 provides as follows:

A by-law cannot prevent keeping of guide dog

A by-law has no force or effect to the extent to which it purports to prohibit or restrict the keeping on a lot of a dog used as a guide or hearing dog by an owner or occupier of the lot or the use of a dog as a guide or hearing dog on a lot or common property.

The strata legislation does not define 'hearing dog'.  The term is defined in the Macquarie Dictionary as "a dog which is trained to aid people with a hearing disability by alerting them to such noises as the door bell or the telephone ringing, fire or burglar alarms, etc."  This definition recognises three components of a hearing dog: it is "trained", it assists person with a hearing disability, and it provides this assistance by alerting the disabled person to household noises such as doorbells, telephone and alarms.  But the definition does not describe the type or scope of training or the manner of alerting the disabled person.

In the District Court the owners corporation tried to narrow the meaning of "hearing dog" by arguing that the term had a technical meaning and applied only to dogs which had a particular period of training (6-8 months), which provided a particular level of assistance (alerting the disabled person to smoke alarms, door knocks, door bells, etc) and utilised a particular manner of alerting the disabled person (by touching the disabled person and leading them to the source of the sound, except in the case of a smoke alarm where the hearing dog would drop to the floor).  The owners corporation relied on brochures supplied by an organisation responsible for training hearing dogs known as Lions Hearing Dogs Inc.

District Court Decision

The District Court disagreed with the owners corporation's interpretation of the meaning of 'hearing dog'.  The Court said there was no reason to limit the plain meaning of a hearing dog in this way.  The Court held that the property meaning of a hearing dog in section 49(4) is a dog trained to assist a person with a hearing disability (be it partial or complete) by alerting them to some normal household sounds, such as a telephone or a doorbell.

But, the inquiry did not stop there.  Section 49(4) requires a dog be "used" as a hearing dog to qualify for the exemption provided by the section.  The District Court held that a dog is ":used as a hearing dog" if a not insignificant part of its function is to alert a person with a hearing disability to normal household sounds.  But the Court said that as a practical matter, it is necessary that a dog, to be used as a hearing dog, be trained so that it can provide the assistance that a hearing dog is trained to provide.

For these reasons (and others) the District Court concluded that Larry is a hearing dog meaning the by-law prohibiting pets did not apply to him as a result of which Mr and Mrs Drexler were entitled to keep Larry in their apartment for use as a hearing dog.

Conclusion

The decision in Drexler provides guidance for the circumstances in which an owner or occupier of an apartment will be able to keep a guide or hearing dog where the building has a by-law prohibiting the keeping of animals, or requiring the permission of the owners corporation in order to keep pets.

If a resident wants to keep a dog in his or her apartment on the basis that the dog is a hearing dog, the dog will need to be trained to assist the resident with a hearing disability by alerting them to some normal household sounds such as a telephone or a doorbell and the dog will need to be "used as a hearing dog" meaning a not significant part of its functions will include alerting the resident to normal household sounds.

No doubt similar requirements will need to be met for any resident seeking to keep a guide dog in a "no pets" building meaning, in general, to qualify as a guide dog, the dog will need to be trained to lead or guide a vision impaired person and used in this manner by the resident seeking to keep the dog.

Finally, the Drexler case provides a salutary lesson for an owners corporation seeking to enforce a "no-pets" by-law against a resident who claims to be using a dog as a hearing or guide dog.  The owners corporation engaged in an expensive and protracted battle to enforce the "no-pets" policy for the building ultimately losing and being ordered to pay Mr and Mrs Drexler's legal costs as well as having to bear its own costs through three separate proceedings.

An owners corporation seeking to enforce a "no-pets" policy must think very carefully before taking legal action when confronted with a resident claiming to be entitled to an exemption from the policy on the grounds that he or she is using a guide or hearing dog in their apartment or on common property.  An owners corporation placed in this position should ask the resident to provide information about the dog particularly in relation to its training and the types of tasks it performs to assist the resident as a hearing or guide dog to enable an assessment to be made as to whether or not the dog is, in fact, a guide or hearing dog that is being used in that manner by the resident and is therefore able to be kept in the building.

By Adrian Mueller

J.S. Mueller & Co Lawyers

Bookmark and Share

Comment from neiljakson on Monday, 19th February 2018

This is such a great resource that you are providing and you give it away for free. I love seeing blog that understand the value of providing a quality resource for free. [URL="http://www.theacademicpapers.co.uk/"]the-academic-papers.co.uk[/url]

Comment from panama.leaks234 on Thursday, 18th January 2018

Aw, this was a very nice post. In idea I wish to put in writing like this additionally ?taking time and precise effort to make a very good article?but what can I say?I procrastinate alot and certainly not seem to get something done. neet 2018

Comment from panama.leaks234 on Tuesday, 16th January 2018

Youre so cool! I dont suppose Ive read something like this before. So nice to locate somebody by authentic applying for grants this subject. realy thanks for starting this up. this site is a thing that’s needed on the web, somebody after a little bit originality. helpful purpose of bringing a new challenge for the web! primewire

Comment from panama.leaks234 on Friday, 12th January 2018

I am typically to blogging and that i really appreciate your site content. This great article has really peaks my interest. My goal is to bookmark your site and maintain checking for brand spanking new data. iphone charger

Comment from panama.leaks234 on Saturday, 30th December 2017

Hey there! Good stuff, do keep us posted when you finally post something like that! bluetooth headphones 

Comment from panama.leaks234 on Saturday, 30th December 2017

Thank you that is very helpful for me, as a new site has been inundated with comments that seem OK at first glance but then get repeated with a slight change of wording. I have something concrete to go on now and will delete quite a lot of them. 1080p Dash Cam 

Comment from panama.leaks234 on Friday, 29th December 2017

I have been exploring for a little bit for any high-quality articles or blog posts on this sort of area . Exploring in Yahoo I at last stumbled upon this website. Reading this information So i am happy to convey that I’ve an incredibly good uncanny feeling I discovered exactly what I needed. I most certainly will make certain to do not forget this web site and give it a glance regularly. internet marketing marketing1on1.com consultant

Comment from panama.leaks234 on Monday, 25th December 2017

Keep doing awesome read few posts on this site and I consider that your web journal is exceptionally fascinating and has sets of fabulous data. how to reduce leg fat

Comment from panama.leaks234 on Saturday, 23rd December 2017

Your article has piqued a lot of positive interest. I can see why since you have done such a good job of making it interesting. Terrell Texas Roofing

Comment from panama.leaks234 on Monday, 18th December 2017

This is the kind of data I've long been attempting to discover. Much obliged to you for composing this data. get internship

Search for services

Find tradesman or property services in your local area.

Search for services